<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pantheism vs. panentheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:48:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing found for Light-replace-suffering-acceptance</title>
		<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing found for Light-replace-suffering-acceptance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realdoctorjay.com/?p=264#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] Pantheism vs. panentheism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pantheism vs. panentheism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorJay</title>
		<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realdoctorjay.com/?p=264#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steve for a well thought out comment.

Some mystical systems have both God as a person and an impersonal God.

I assume that according to ACIM we are all the Christ, the only begotten, but think that all spiritual  thoughts may have some validity. 

To an extent we are all blind men trying to explain what that elephant is like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steve for a well thought out comment.</p>
<p>Some mystical systems have both God as a person and an impersonal God.</p>
<p>I assume that according to ACIM we are all the Christ, the only begotten, but think that all spiritual  thoughts may have some validity. </p>
<p>To an extent we are all blind men trying to explain what that elephant is like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realdoctorjay.com/?p=264#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Some random thoughts. 

God (as I have experienced Him) is both utterly transcendent and wonderfully immanent. He works all in all but retains His transcendence and immanence into eternity.

Physical objects exist as projected icons of the metaphysical (sometimes these may be induced supernaturally, that is, their manifestation in the physical universe is not at all accidental). 

If you extrapolate this to include all natural phenomenon one can start to approach a working (albeit restricted) inner knowledge of God.  

Evidently (or demonstrably) Jesus Christ (or God as Person) has existed from the very beginning of recorded time and is the means through which God reclaims Himself &lt;i&gt;from&lt;/i&gt; out of the world of men. 

Panentheism is a better description of what the &quot;ancients&quot; believed. 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some random thoughts. </p>
<p>God (as I have experienced Him) is both utterly transcendent and wonderfully immanent. He works all in all but retains His transcendence and immanence into eternity.</p>
<p>Physical objects exist as projected icons of the metaphysical (sometimes these may be induced supernaturally, that is, their manifestation in the physical universe is not at all accidental). </p>
<p>If you extrapolate this to include all natural phenomenon one can start to approach a working (albeit restricted) inner knowledge of God.  </p>
<p>Evidently (or demonstrably) Jesus Christ (or God as Person) has existed from the very beginning of recorded time and is the means through which God reclaims Himself <i>from</i> out of the world of men. </p>
<p>Panentheism is a better description of what the &#8220;ancients&#8221; believed. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert cipriani</title>
		<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>albert cipriani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realdoctorjay.com/?p=264#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Right.  Total Reality is a much better word for God than God.  It clears the clutter of things vs. spirits and things happening vs. consciousness of things happening.  Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  Total Reality is a much better word for God than God.  It clears the clutter of things vs. spirits and things happening vs. consciousness of things happening.  Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God is in everything I see &#124; Real Doctor Jay&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://realdoctorjay.com/pantheism-panentheism/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>God is in everything I see &#124; Real Doctor Jay&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realdoctorjay.com/?p=264#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] Pantheism vs. panentheism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pantheism vs. panentheism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

